Evaluación del impacto emocional de la pandemia COVID-19 en pacientes en hemodiálisis: un estudio transversal analítico / Evaluation Of The Emotional Impact Of The Covid-19 Pandemic On Hemodialysis Patients: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

Antecedentes: Los pacientes en hemodiálisis padecen, debido a su diagnóstico y tratamiento, mayores niveles de ansiedad y depresión que la población general. El objetivo de esta investigación es conocer el impacto emocional generado por la COVID-19 en pacientes hemodializados. Método: Estudio transversal analítico en una muestra total de 88 pacientes mayores de 18 años que reciben hemodiálisis entre abril de 2021 y marzo de 2022. Se recogen variables sociodemográficas y clínicas incluyendo aquellas relacionadas con COVID-19. A todos los pacientes se les administran las escalas HADS y Kessler-10. Resultados: La puntuación media de la escala HADS-A fue de 5,3 (±3,732), de la HADS-D de 5,45 (±4,052) y de la Kessler-10 de 20,11(±7,499). Se observaron diferencias significativas entre aislados y no aislados en las escalas clínicas HADS-A (p=,002) y HADS-D (p=,005). Igualmente, aquellos pacientes con antecedentes psicopatológicos fueron significativamente más jóvenes (p=,014) y con una mayor puntuación en las escalas HADS-D (p=,016) y Kessler-10 (p=,035) que aquellos sin antecedentes. Conclusiones: No hubo asociación entre infección por COVID-19 y la clínica ansioso-depresiva en pacientes hemodializados. El aislamiento, en estos pacientes, no se asocia a la aparición de clínica psicopatológica, mientras que el hecho de haber presentado antecedentes psicopatológicos previos se asocia a su desarrollo.(AU)

Background: Hemodialysis patients suffer, due to their diagnosis and treatment, higher levels of anxiety and depression than the general population. The aim of this research is to know the emotional impact generated by COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients. Method: Analytical cross-sectional study in a total sample of 88 patients over 18 years of age receiving hemodialysis between April 2021 and March 2022. Sociodemographic and clinical variables including those related to COVID-19 are collected. All patients were administered the HADS and Kessler-10 scales. Results: The mean score of the HADS-A scale was 5.3(±3.732) of the HADS-D 5.45 (±4.052) and of the Kessler-10 20.11(±7.499). Significant differences were observed between isolated and non-isolated patients in the clinical scales HADS-A (p=.002) and HADS-D (p=.005). Likewise, those patients with a psychopathological history were significantly younger (p=.014) and scored higher on the HADS-D (p=.016) and Kessler-10 (p=.035) scales than those without a history. Conclusions: There was no association between COVID-19 infection and anxious-depressive symptoms in hemodialyzed patients. Isolation, in these patients, was not associated with the appearance of psychopathological symptoms, while the fact of having a previous history of psychopathology was associated with their development.(AU)

Analysis of psychometric questionnaires used in patient selection for bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: In severe forms of obesity there is a high prevalence of psychopathological comorbidity. Psychiatric evaluation is an important component of comprehensive obesity care and contributes to optimizing therapeutic results after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of psychometric tests used in the protocol for selecting patients for bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective naturalistic observational study of 100 patients who were candidates for bariatric surgery. Patients who complete the psychometric protocol and the psychiatric interview between January 2019 and June 2021 are included. Two groups are formed: those considered unfit for any psychopathological reason and those considered fit. To evaluate the effectiveness of the tests used, ROC curves will be used. The sensitivity and specificity values of each test used will be obtained. RESULTS: 97 patients included, aged between 20 and 61 years, 64.9% women. 51.5% had a family history and 38.1% a personal history of any psychiatric disorder. Regarding the area under the curve, the scales that presented a value greater than 0.7 were the YFAS total score (0.771), HADS-D (0.757), the Edinburgh Bulimia total score (0.747), the severity score of YFAS (0.722) and Edinburgh Bulimia Severity Score (0.705). The most frequent diagnoses as a cause of exclusion were Food Addiction 8 (20.5%) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) 6 (15.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The YFAS, BITE and HADS-A scales were useful to discriminate those patients considered unsuitable for bariatric surgery for any psychopathological cause.